Rawlings
No payout yet
This case is still being litigated — there’s no settlement fund, so there’s nothing to claim yet. We’ll notify you if that changes.
What Happened?
This lawsuit alleges that Rawlings Sporting Goods misled consumers by advertising certain baseball and fastpitch bats as newly improved, redesigned, or enhanced while allegedly obtaining certification for those same bats by representing that the changes were only cosmetic and did not materially affect performance. Plaintiffs claim consumers relied on Rawlings’ marketing statements about improved performance and paid premium prices for bats they believed contained meaningful upgrades. The lawsuit seeks damages and other relief on behalf of purchasers of the affected bats.
Could Rawlings Owe Me Money?
Possibly, but not yet. No settlement has been reached, so there’s no fund and no fixed amount — Payouts range from $10-$100+.
If the case settles or a court rules in the class’s favor, we’ll show the real payout terms here and notify everyone on the waitlist.
Who Might This Case Cover?
- If you purchased a Rawlings, Easton, Combat, Miken, or Worth brand baseball or fastpitch bat in the United States within the past four years.
Case details
- Case
- TBD
- Court
- TBD
- Settlement administrator
- TBD
- Final approval hearing
- TBD
Legal notice
There's no claim form for this case yet because it hasn't settled. Joining the waitlist doesn't cost anything and doesn't submit anything on your behalf.Claim is not affiliated with any class action administrator, law firm, or court.